Man in a cedar cold plunge at dawn with rising steam, illustrating cold exposure and recovery
Recovery··6 min read

How Long Should a Cold Shower Be? What 11 Minutes a Week Really Means

Cold showers are sold on aging, brown fat and inflammation. Those are the three claims that did not survive the trials. What is left is smaller, cheaper and more useful than the promise, and it takes thirty seconds.

Updated August 2026 · Reviewed by Roy Sañudo S.

Key Takeaways

  • On sick days off work, 30, 60 and 90 seconds all did the same thing. That is one outcome in one trial, and nobody has compared durations on anything else
  • In that trial of 3,018 people, sick days fell 29% — but the number of days people were actually ill did not change, and plain exercise beat the cold shower (35%)
  • '11 minutes a week' comes from a podcast, not a trial. The only dose that ever switched on brown fat in a human was two hours a day for six weeks
  • Mood did not improve in the 2025 review — which is the reason most people start
  • What survives: the alertness jolt, better reported sleep and quality of life, and thirty seconds it costs you

You have stood there with your hand on the tap, not turning it. Here is the number that decides it: thirty seconds, most days. That is the low end of the only range anyone has compared head to head, and in that trial thirty seconds did as much as ninety. The "eleven minutes a week" you have heard is not from a trial at all.

What was actually tested: 30 to 90 seconds, daily

In 2016 a team at the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam randomly assigned 3,018 adults to finish every shower with cold water for 30, 60 or 90 seconds, or to change nothing, every day for thirty days. It is still the largest test of cold showers anyone has run.

The trial measured seven things. Days off work fell by 29%. Quality-of-life and anxiety scores nudged in the right direction, and the authors themselves called that shift too small to matter clinically. And the one that gets left out: the number of days people were actually ill did not change. They were absent less. They were not shown to be less ill.

Two more things. Nobody was blinded, and people wrote down their own sick days — the authors say plainly that a placebo effect cannot be ruled out. And inside that same trial, plain exercise beat the cold shower: regular physical activity cut sick days by 35% against the shower's 29%, and doing both came to 54%.

The duration finding, read honestly: on sick days off work, 30, 60 and 90 seconds all did the same thing. That is one outcome in one trial. Nobody has compared durations on anything else.

Where "11 minutes a week" comes from, and what it sits next to

From a person, not a study. The figure traces to Andrew Huberman, the Stanford neuroscientist whose podcast popularised it — his reading of the literature, split into two to four sessions. A reasonable convention. Not a finding.

Now hold it next to the dose that has actually changed something in a human body. To switch on brown fat, the calorie-burning tissue everyone talks about, researchers used two hours a day at 17°C for six weeks. Body fat did fall. That is roughly seventy-five times eleven minutes a week. When you read that cold "activates brown fat," that is the dose it took.

What you actually get

The immediate effect is real and nobody disputes its direction. Cold water sets off a fast, large release of norepinephrine, the chemical behind feeling sharply awake. In a study at Charles University in Prague, young men sat in 14°C (57°F) water and their norepinephrine rose 530%, with the rate they burned energy up 350%. That was a full hour up to the neck, not a minute under a shower, and the published summary never says how many men took part — which tells you what weight one number can carry. The same lab ran it again and got a four-fold rise, not five — and when they repeated the immersions three times a week for six weeks, nothing adapted.

Beyond alertness, a 2025 review of eleven randomized trials covering 3,177 people reported better sleep quality and better quality of life, though it did not pool those statistically. Stress fell too, but only when measured twelve hours later, and not at any other time point.

And the one people most expect: mood did not improve. That review found nothing, off a single twenty-person study, and there is essentially no trial evidence on cold showers and depression. If feeling happier is why you were going to start, that is the claim with the least behind it.

What it does not do

Cold does move the machinery. Give ten men ten minutes in 8°C water and nothing else, and the master gene for building mitochondria — the tiny power plants inside every cell — climbs within hours. But when researchers followed that signal for six weeks, the mitochondria themselves had not changed, and neither had the muscle's capacity to use oxygen. A gene switching on is not a body rebuilt.

Nobody has shown that cold water changes how fast a person ages. The protective brain proteins you may have read about come from a mouse study using laboratory cooling, not showers.

Brown fat at shower doses is the same story. Winter swimmers studied at the University of Copenhagen produced more heat in the cold, but their brown fat was not more active — and they paired cold dips with hot sauna, so the credit cannot go to the cold alone. It is a snapshot of two groups of men, not a trial.

The claim that runs backwards

Cold is usually sold as anti-inflammatory. When that 2025 review pooled the trials, inflammation markers were higher right after cold water and higher again an hour later. Read it carefully: they compared each person before and after, not cold against a control group, and in several of those trials people had just exercised — so some of the rise may be the exercise. So the anti-inflammatory story is not supported in the hours right after, and the long-term question is open.

If you lift weights, put the cold on another day

Cold water straight after lifting blunts muscle growth. One trial of sixteen men found size suffered while strength held, but when researchers pooled ten studies, strength was blunted too. Every one of those trials used ten to fifteen minutes of full immersion, not a minute under a shower, and nobody has tested whether a thirty-second shower affects a lifter at all. Keep the cold off your training days.

Who should not do this

Cold water is a real stress on the body, not a wellness accessory.

  • Do not do this at all if cold makes you come out in hives. That is cold urticaria, and about a third of people who have it get a whole-body allergic reaction to cold, which in water can kill.
  • Talk to your doctor first if you have heart problems, high blood pressure, or any condition affected by sudden blood-pressure changes. The 3,018-person trial deliberately excluded anyone with heart or lung disease, so it tells you nothing about you. In the Prague study, blood pressure and heart rate went up in cold water.
  • Never hold your breath or do rapid breathing exercises in or near water. People have drowned this way. Cold water sets off irregular heartbeats even in healthy volunteers — the cold shock speeds the heart while the reflex to cold slows it, and the two fight. Do breathing practice sitting on the floor instead.
  • Never cold plunge alone, especially in open water. The first gasp is involuntary — your body does it whether you agree or not.
  • Get out if you feel dizzy, if your lips turn blue, or if your shivering stops being something you control.

What to do tomorrow

Tomorrow, do not take a cold shower.

Take your normal one, and at the end, note how many seconds you think you could have stood it. Do that for three days. On the fourth, turn the tap cold for thirty seconds, and then keep it there. Do not climb — the trial found no benefit past thirty, so there is nothing up there to earn.

One thing that decides whether you are doing this at all: "cold" means the coldest your tap runs. In the trial that was Dutch tap water in winter, around 10°C (50°F). If your tap runs lukewarm in August, you are not doing what was tested.

Then let yourself warm up on your own instead of reaching for the hot tap, and keep it off your lifting days. That is the whole protocol, and it is deliberately smaller than the internet's — thirty seconds, most mornings, for how the next hour feels. Not for your mitochondria. Roy takes one most days and says so on his own page, including that he keeps doing it despite everything above. That is a preference, not evidence, and it is worth being clear which is which.

Where the science stands

Our read after cross-checking every study and expert view.

Key findings

  • Strong evidenceThe only randomized dose comparison of cold showers assigned 3,018 adults to 30, 60 or 90 seconds daily for 30 days (Buijze et al., PLoS ONE 2016). The three durations produced a similar result, so there is no evidence that longer is better. 79% completed the full 30-day protocol and no related serious adverse events were reported.
  • Strong evidenceThat trial's headline and its null belong in the same sentence. Sickness absence from work fell 29% (incidence rate ratio 0.71, p=0.003), but the number of illness days showed no significant group effect. People were absent less; they were not shown to be less ill. One author was employed by the Dutch insurer Achmea while the study measured absence from work.
  • Strong evidenceCold is widely sold as anti-inflammatory, and the most recent synthesis points the other way in the short term. A 2025 systematic review of 11 randomized trials and 3,177 participants found inflammation markers rose significantly immediately after cold-water immersion and again an hour later (Cain et al., PLoS ONE 2025). Only 1 of those 11 trials used showers rather than baths or plunges.
  • Moderate evidenceThe 530% norepinephrine figure comes with two numbers that rarely travel with it. In the same Prague immersion study, metabolic rate rose 350% at 14C, and blood pressure and heart rate went up rather than down. Cortisol did not rise at any of the three water temperatures tested.
  • Early signalA separate 90-day randomized trial in 60 healthy adults reported higher immunoglobulin levels in a cold-shower group than a hot-shower group (El-Ansary et al., Journal of Thermal Biology 2024). It is small, single-centre, and measures a blood marker rather than whether anyone actually got sick less often, so it sits below the two studies above.

Where the research agrees

Independent groups in Amsterdam, Prague, Copenhagen and Adelaide agree on the immediate physiology: cold water produces a large, fast sympathetic response, and it is genuinely uncomfortable by design. They also agree, including the researchers most enthusiastic about cold, that no trial has established an optimal protocol.

Where it's still debated

Inflammation is the live disagreement. The popular claim is that cold lowers it; the 2025 meta-analysis found it acutely raised. Whether long-term cold exposure changes baseline inflammation is a different and unsettled question. Also debated: whether the winter-swimmer findings belong to the cold at all, since that population pairs cold dips with hot sauna.

Scientific References

This article synthesizes research from the following institutions and studies. All content is derived from peer-reviewed scientific literature and leading research centers.

Dr. Andrew Huberman (Stanford), Cold Exposure Protocols — a researcher's synthesis of the literature, not a dose-comparison trial. Source of the widely quoted 11-minutes-per-week figure.

Dr. Susanna Søberg: "The Søberg Principle" (end cold, rewarm naturally) — a practical guideline drawn from her winter-swimmer research below, not a separately tested protocol.

Buijze et al., PLoS ONE: "The Effect of Cold Showering on Health and Work: A Randomized Controlled Trial" (2016). PMID 27631616. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0161749. Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam. n=3,018 randomized to a 30, 60 or 90 second cold shower or control for 30 days — the only dose comparison that exists. Sickness ABSENCE fell 29% (IRR 0.71, p=0.003); illness DAYS showed no significant group effect. One author was employed by the insurer Achmea while the trial measured absence from work. Erratum PMID 30071104 (2018) is a data-availability correction only; no result changed.

Cain et al., PLoS ONE: "Effects of cold-water immersion on health and wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (2025). PMID 39879231. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0317615. University of South Australia. 11 randomized trials, 3,177 participants. Found cold water RAISES inflammation acutely (SMD 1.03 immediately, 1.26 at 1 hour); stress reduced only at 12 hours; immunity null at 0 and 1 hour. Only 1 of the 11 trials used showers. Concludes the optimal protocol is still unestablished.

Šrámek et al., European Journal of Applied Physiology: "Human physiological responses to immersion into water of different temperatures" (2000). PMID 10751106. DOI 10.1007/s004210050065. Charles University, Prague. A small group of young men, head-out immersion for 1 hour at 32/20/14C; at 14C noradrenaline rose 530%, dopamine 250% and metabolic rate 350%. This is the origin of the "530%" figure. Note: the abstract does not state a sample size, so the "n=10" often quoted for it is unverified here.

Fyfe et al., Journal of Applied Physiology: "Cold water immersion attenuates anabolic signaling and skeletal muscle fiber hypertrophy, but not strength gain, following whole-body resistance training" (2019). PMID 31513450. DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00127.2019. Deakin University / Victoria University / Australian Institute of Sport. Muscle SIZE was blunted; STRENGTH was not. The paper sets no safe interval in hours.

Peretti et al., Nature: "RBM3 mediates structural plasticity and protective effects of cooling in neurodegeneration" (2015). PMID 25607368. DOI 10.1038/nature14142. MRC Toxicology Unit, then at the University of Leicester; senior author Giovanna Mallucci also at the University of Cambridge. MOUSE study using laboratory cooling and lentiviral RBM3 overexpression, not cold showers.

Søberg et al., Cell Reports Medicine: "Altered brown fat thermoregulation and enhanced cold-induced thermogenesis in young, healthy, winter-swimming men" (2021). PMID 34755128. DOI 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100408. University of Copenhagen / Rigshospitalet. Read the finding carefully: the winter swimmers showed GREATER cold-induced thermogenesis but an ABSENCE of brown-fat activity, with brown-fat glucose uptake rising similarly to controls — not "more active brown fat". Cross-sectional, men only, and the exposure combines cold dips with hot sauna. Two authors declare industry ties (Novo Nordisk; Embark Biotech).

Curated by Roy Sañudo S.

Research Curator, Anima Cosmi

Anima Cosmi translates peer-reviewed research from Harvard, Oxford, Stanford, the Salk Institute, and other leading labs into plain language. Every article names its researchers, institutions, and publication years, so you can check the sources yourself.

Not medical advice. Anima Cosmi is a research curator, not a medical practice: this is education, not a prescription. Talk to a qualified healthcare provider before starting any new supplement, diet, or routine, especially if you take medication or have a health condition.


Continue Reading